Skip to main content

To: Mark V. Afable, Commissioner of Insurance

End Breed-Restrictive Insurance Practices in Wisconsin

End Breed-Restrictive Insurance Practices in Wisconsin

If your dog is well-behaved, there is no reason that an insurance company should arbitrarily deny or cancel your homeowner's or renter's coverage.

Currently, responsible pet owners of particular breeds or mixes of dogs are charged extra premiums, denied insurance coverage, or can have their policy canceled by their insurance company. These arbitrary decisions are all based upon what breed the dog APPEARS to be, not the dog's behavior. The practice of using breed as a predictor of risk is unsupported by reliable data.

We ask Mark V. Afable to issue regulations to stop breed restrictions by insurance companies operating in Wisconsin. Consumers should not have to be underinsured, uninsured, or be forced to give up their dogs to have affordable renters or homeowner’s insurance.

Why is this important?

There is a wide range of dogs falling within the category of “risk” breeds according to some insurance companies including Boxers, Giant Schnauzers, German Shepherds, Chows, Great Danes, Alaskan Malamutes, American Staffordshire Terriers, Akitas, Cane Corsos, American Bulldogs, Belgian Malinois, Keeshonds, Rhodesian Ridgebacks, Ovtcharkas, Siberian Huskies, Dobermans, Pit Bulls, Dalmatians, Rottweilers, Australian Cattle dogs and more.

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners [NAIC] should protect pet-owning consumers. Insurance companies should focus on the behavior of the dog. Dogs with aggressive behavior should not be protected by any moratorium.

This is important because dogs are viewed by the vast majority of Americans as part of the family, and the ability for people to keep families together should be protected. Breed-restrictive insurance practices can force responsible pet owners to give up their pets and increase the number of pets in shelters.

The likelihood a dog will bite is based on many factors such as socialization of the dog, obedience training, supervision provided by the owner, and how the victim interacts with the dog. It has not been proven by scientific evidence that aggressive behavior is present in any particular breed of dog. Insurance companies that want to reduce risk should focus solely on behavior of the dog and the behavior of the owner.

Wisconsin, United States

Maps © Stamen; Data © OSM and contributors, ODbL


Reasons for signing

  • I signed because there are no bad breeds just owners who don’t know how to train their dogs.
  • I signed because there are no bad dogs, only bad owners. An animal should not be discriminated against because of the people who decide to abuse and torture their dogs. All poorly trained, untrained, or abused dogs can be dangerous, no matter the size. Small dogs can be vicious too. So to discriminate against dogs that are merely perceived as dangerous by some image the public has of that type of dog is totally unfair. Each dog is an individual!

Updates

2021-07-21 16:20:29 -0500

100 signatures reached

2021-07-15 07:13:27 -0500

50 signatures reached

2021-07-14 18:50:04 -0500

25 signatures reached

2021-07-14 15:20:46 -0500

10 signatures reached